ABSTRACT
Background: Even if definitive evidence is still missing, prone position in non-intubated hypoxemic patients with Covid-19 is largely used. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the amount and distribution of lung abnormalities evaluated by CT-scan can predict the improvement of oxygenation when Covid-19 patients undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) are turned prone. Method(s): Retrospective monocentric study of severe Covid-19 patients who underwent NIV and prone position, evaluated with a basal chest CT-scan. Result(s): Forty-five severe Covid-19 patients were considered. On average 50% of the overall lung volume was involved by pneumonia at CT-scan, with ground glass, and consolidation accounting for 44, and 4%, respectively. The parenchymal abnormalities were predominantly posterior, as demonstrated by a posterior/anterior ratio of ground glass and consolidation of 1.5, and 4.4, respectively. PaO2/FiO2, whose basal value under NIV in supine position was 140 [IQR 108;169] improved on average by 67% (+98) during prone position. Once supine position was resumed, improvement in oxygenation was maintained in 28 patients (62% of the overall population, categorized as "responders"). We did not find significant difference between responders and non-responders in terms of the amount and distribution of parenchymal abnormalities. No correlation emerged between the distribution of parenchymal abnormalies and changes in oxygenation in supine position before and after prone position (R2 = 0.009, p= 0.526). Conclusion(s): the amount and distribution of lung abnormalities evaluated by CT-scan do not predict the response to awake prone position in patients with severe Covid-19 pneumonia undergoing non-invasive ventilation.
ABSTRACT
Background: Failing autoregulation of pulmonary vessels and higher shunt have been described in Covid-19 related Acute respiratory failure (ARF). The aim was to investigate shunt fraction in patients with Covid-19-ARF compared to patients with other causes of ARF. Method(s): Observational study of hospitalized patients with Covid-19-ARF and other causes of ARF at Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy between June 2020 and November 2021. Shunt fraction was measured by a non-invasive system during spontaneous breathing (BeaconCaresystem). Result(s): We enrolled 51 adult patients (8 female), mean age (+/-SD) 65+/-13 years and mean BMI 28,3+/-5,3 Kg/m2. Covid-19-ARF patients represented 71% (36/51). Community acquired pneumonia was the most common cause of other ARF (11/15). No differences in terms of age and BMI were described between the two groups. Pulmonary gas exchange impairment was similar, median PaO2/FIO2 ratio was 254 [IQR 162,297] in Covid-19-ARF and 269 [IQR 201,296] in other causes of ARF patients (p=0.41). Nevertheless, mean shunt fraction resulted significantly increased in Covid-19-ARF (18+/-6%) than other causes of ARF patients (12+/-9%;p=0.03) Fig. 1. Conclusion(s): Shunt fraction appears to be increased in Covid-19-ARF if compared to patients with other causes of ARF. However, this is the first study proposing this non-invasive method to measure shunt fraction in ARF and further investigations are needed to validate this technique.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents a major clinical problem in terms of death and long-term sequelae. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Montichiari Hospital (Brescia, Italy) to better understand different determinants of outcome in different COVID-19 outbreaks. Design and method: A total of 635 patients admitted from local emergency room with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a moderate to severe COVID-19 were included in the present study. A group of 260 consecutive patients during SARS-CoV-2 first wave (from February to May 2020) and 375 consecutive patients during SARS-CoV-2 second/third wave (from October 2020 to May 2021) were considered. Demographic data, comorbidities, ongoing treatment and bio-humoral, respiratory and haemodynamic data were recorded and compared. Results: Main demographic data (Table 1) were not significantly different in the two considered time-lapses, except a lower prevalence of female sex during first wave. Mortality rate was significantly lower during the latter period (25% vs 11%;p < 0.001). Time from symptoms onset to hospital admission was longer during first wave (7.8 ± 5.6 vs 5.6 ± 4.3 days;p < 0.001) while hospital staying was significantly shorter (11 ± 10 vs 15 ± 12 days;p < 0.001). Other significant differences were a wider use of corticosteroids and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) as well less antibiotic prescription during the second wave (Table 2). Respiratory, bio-humoral and x-Ray score were significantly poorer at the time of admission in first-wave patients (Table 3). After a multivariate regression analysis, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin values, % fraction of inspired oxygen at admission, days after symptoms onset and duration of hospital staying were the strongest predictors of outcome in both periods. Concomitant anti-hypertensive treatment (including ACE-inhibitors and ARBs) did not affect outcome. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest that an earlier diagnosis, a timely hospital admission and a rational use of the therapeutic options allowed to reduce the rate of systemic inflammation response (of which CRP is a hallmark) and granted a better outcome during the second of the two time-lapses considered.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Worldwide spread of SARS-CoV-2 caused a pandemic as never were seen in the last fifty years and represented a major clinical problem in Lombardy, one of the most affected Italian Regions, in terms of death toll and long-term sequelae. This is particularly true when elder people are considered;therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in the General Medicine of our Hospital. Design and method: In the present study we recorded data of patients older than 65 years, admitted to a COVID-19 unit during 2020 and 2021;we compared the characteristics of in-patients admitted in the first (March-May 2020) and the second/ third pandemic waves (October 2020-May 2021) Results: A total of 407 patients 65 year-old and older were included, 185 during the first wave and 222 during second/third waves;63 (34%) of them died during the first and 36 (16%) during the second/third wave. No significant differences were found according to main comorbidities and chronic prescriptions between the two groups of patients, whereas those admitted during the second/third wave were slightly older. Number of in-hospital adverse events were similar in the two samples. Main differences between the two groups were: a lower mean number of days with symptoms before hospitalization, and a less severe laboratory, respiratory ed radiologic profile. Further, steroid treatment was highly implemented during the second/third wave. Conclusions: Older patients admitted to hospital since the beginning of the pandemic showed diverse clinical severity profile according to different waves;patient admitted during the first wave had worse respiratory, radiological and laboratory parameters than those admitted in the second/third wave;further difference was found in COVID-19 treatment during hospital stay as steroids were largely administered during the latter waves.
ABSTRACT
Background: In this SARS CoV-2 pandemic, there is a need of rapid and reliable diagnostic tools for highly urgent cases. Antigen tests lack of sensitivity at low viral load so there is the need of molecular tools allowing a rapid diagnosis. In this study we evaluated VitaPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay (Credo), a rapid (20 min) POC nucleic acid amplification test used for patients admitted to Emergency Department.Materials and Methods: The VitaPCR™ detects: the human η-globin gene, a specific sequence on the nucleocapside N-encoding gene and a conserved sequence (common to SARS-CoV2, SARSCoV, and SARS-like bat coronavirus) located on the N encoding gene. Diagnostic accuracy was determined in 73 nasopharyngeal specimens (NP) samples in comparison to the routine and STAT rRT-PCR methods in use. In particular, 24 NP samples, 11 positive for ORF8 (Ct 17.5-35.3) and RdRP (Ct 18.9-33.6) genes were tested on EliTech diagnostic line and 21 NP samples, 13 positive for E (Ct 16.7-35.3) and RdRP (Ct 18.9 -36.4) genes were tested on Roche diagnostic line, requiring a previous RNA extraction, with total assay time of 5 hours. 28 NP samples, 18 positive for E (Ct 11.7-34.6) and N2 (Ct 14.3-37.0) genes were tested on STAT GeneXpert System (Cepheid) diagnostic line, with total assay time of 1 hour. To evaluate if VitaPCR™ assay influenced the management times of patients in the emergency room (ER) a comparison of a 45 days period (from 1 June to 14 July) with (year 2021) and without (year 2020) the use VitaPCR™ was performed.Results: An agreement of 100% in SARS CoV-2 RNA detection for ELITe MGB amplification Kit (ELITech) on a CFX96™ System (Bio-Rad) and of 95.2% with weighted k of Cohen of 0.901 (95% CI 0.714 - 1.000) for LightCycler z-480 (Roche) using LightMix ® Modular Wuhan CoV RdRP-gene and LightMix ® SarbecoV E-gene plus EAV control kits (Roche) was found. An agreement of 96.4% with weighted k of Cohen of 0.924 (95% CI 0.778 - 1.000) was found between VitaPCR™ and Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2. For systems targeting N gene (VitaPCR™and Xpert Xpress) P/B regression was: Ct VitaPCR™ = 1.012 (0.918-1.196) Ct Xpert Xpress + 0.000 (95% CI: -1.230 - 0.000). A reduction in ER stay of 35min (-16%), 13min (-7%), 9min (-8%) and 6min (-8%) was recorded for Red (n=151), Yellow (n=703), Green (n=2621) and White (n=466) codes patients, respectively in 2021 vs 2020.Conclusion: The VitaPCR™ SARS-CoV-2 represents an accurate molecular POCT suitable for a rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 also allowing a reduction in management times of critical patients in the ER.
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Aim Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is mainly based on gene detection through polymerase chain reaction analysis on nasopharyngeal swab. The Allplex TM 2019-nCoV assay targets 3 different viral genes: RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, envelope, and nucleocapside. A coding system was developed based on different number of genes expressed: a nasopharyngeal swab was considered "positive" if all 3 genes tested underwent amplification, "mildly positive" if only 2 out of 3 genes were detected, "uncertain" if only 1 gene and "negative" if none resulted amplified from the test. Our aim was to assess whether this classification correlates with clinical outcome in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. Methods This is a retrospective study including patients admitted with diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to a medical ward at the Montichiari Hospital, Brescia, Italy, from February 28 to April 30, 2020. All patients underwent the nasopharyngeal swab upon admission. Results A total of 204 patients were included in this study. Patients with full positive nasopharyngeal swab showed higher values of C-reactive protein and neutrophiles/lymphocytes ratio compared with patients with mildly positive or uncertain nasopharyngeal swab. Mortality did not differ between the 2 groups. A Cox multivariate analysis showed that age, male sex, and CRP values are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that patients with a complete SARS-CoV-2 gene detection nasopharyngeal swab show a higher inflammatory profile, and this can be an indirect measurement of viral load in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Patients affected by novel pandemic SARS-CoV-2 may develop COVID-19 related pneumonia, which is potentially fatal. To date, the role of ongoing treatments for different conditions (such as hypertension) has been clarified in terms of their impact on survival and there is no established specific therapy for the disease, although many molecules are under investigation. Aim of the present study was testing those two issues in a population of 258 consecutive patients admitted from 29 February to 30 April 2020 to General Medicine ward of the Hospital of Montichiari (Brixia). Design and method: A group of 258 patients (173 males and 85 females, aged 71 ± 14) was enrolled. Their medical record and ongoing treatment were assessed. Patients were treated according to emerging information with oxygen, anti-malarian agents, anti-viral drugs, different antibiotics (azithromycin and others), tocilizumab and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at different doses. As of June 10th, 65 deaths had been observed. Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison between groups was performed with Breslow and Mantel-Cox test Results: Ongoing therapy with ACE-inhibitors at the time of admission was associated with a worse prognosis (p=0.004), while no difference in survival was observed in patients under treatment with ARBs (p=0.68). Ongoing treatment with statins (p<0.001), low-dose aspirin (p<0.001) and steroids (p<0.001) was associated with a poorer outcome as well Administration during hospitalization of LMWH (p<0.001), steroids (p<0.001), anti-viral drugs (p=0.002), anti-malarian drugs (p<0.001) and tocilizumab (p<0.001), improved prognosis, while antibiotics (azithromycin and other) didn't have any impact. Conclusions: our experience confirms most findings in ongoing trials. Surprisingly, treatment with ACE-inhibitors seems to impact negatively on survival in patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. A possible explanation may be that patients treated with certain drugs are more comorbid and due to this, more fragile.
ABSTRACT
Objective: COVID-19 is a new disease caused by pandemic SARS-CoV-2, that involves multiple organs and can cause a potentially fatal respiratory distress syndrome. Accumulating evidence point out that an “endothelitis” due to a cytokines storm causes intravascular thrombosis, especially in the lungs, and is related to the poor outcome. We tested possible relationships between anticoagulant treatment and/or administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at different doses and outcome in a population of 258 COVID-19 patients admitted from February 28th to April 30th, 2020 to General Medicine ward of the Hospital of Montichiari (Brixia, Italy). Design and method: A group of 258 consecutive patients (174 males and 84 females, mean age 71 years +/-14) was included in the present study. In 168 patients, high-flow oxygen was required (Venturi mask), 6 patients needed orotracheal intubation and 20 were given continuous positive pressure oxygen therapy (CPAP). Patient were treated (unless a pulmonary embolism was detected) with different doses of prophylactic LMWH, according to emerging evidence during pandemic period. As of June 10th, 65 deaths had been observed. Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison between groups was performed with Breslow and Mantel-Cox test. Results: LMWH at standard dose (4000 IU once daily) didn't reduce mortality compared to no treatment (p=ns), while LMWH at a higher dose than usual prophylactic dose (enoxaparin 6000 IU once daily or 4000 IU bid) was associated with better outcome (p<0.001 vs untreated and treated with standard dose). Significance was confirmed adding patients treated with oral anti-coagulant (OAC)for any reason. None of the patients treated with LMWH at higher doses or OAC died. Conclusions: The administration of subcutaneous LMWH at a higher dose than indicated for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis is associated with a better outcome in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, confirming some emerging evidence.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Emerging data show that hypertension as well as other cardiovascular risk factors may have a major role on outcome in terms of death on patients with COVID-19. We analysed a population of 258 consecutive patients admitted to General Medicine ward of the Hospital of Montichiari (Brixia, Italy) from 29 February to 30 April 2020. Design and method: A group of 258 consecutive patients (173 males and 85 females, aged 71 ± 14) was enrolled. In 168 patients, high-flow oxygen was required (Venturi mask), 20 patients needed orotracheal intubation and 11 were given continuous positive pressure oxygen therapy (CPAP). Patients were treated with the best approach according to available evidence during pandemic period: anti-malaria agents, anti-viral drugs, antibiotics (azithromycin and others), tocilizumab and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). As of June 10th, 65 deaths had been observed. Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison between groups was performed with Breslow and Mantel-Cox test. Results: As shown in the table, a significant raise in mortality was observed in patients older than 65 years (p<0.001), of male sex (p<0.001), hypertensives (p<0.001) as well as in patients with heart disease (picture 1;p<0.001), COPD (picture 2;p=0.004), diabetes (p<0.001) and neoplasms (p=0.03) compared with patients with no comorbidities or different diseases, both at discharge and at standard follow-up. The number of comorbidities impacted on survival as well. Conclusions: Hypertension, heart disease and cardiovascular risk factors play a significant role as a negative prognostic factor in patients affected by SARSCoV-2 pneumonia. This confirms previous observations (Pol Arch Intern Med 2020;130(4):304-309) and outlines the importance of prevention of contagion in population with cardiovascular risk factors or established cardiovascular disease.
ABSTRACT
Aim: The aim of this study was to test an experimental approach involving the remote monitoring of orthodontic patients through the use of their smartphones. Background: Due to the COVID-19 emergency, dental offices were asked to stop elective treatments;suddenly orthodontic patients found themselves isolated at home, without the possibility of monitoring by their orthodontists. The use of telemonitoring via smartphones can be a quick way to recover the orthodontist-patient relationship, monitor and continue the treatment. Objective: The purpose of this study was to propose an innovative, simple and reliable approach for the remote management of orthodontic patients. Methods: 137 patients were contacted verbally by phone and via WhatsApp®;they were asked to send a set of photographs taken with their smartphone. They were asked to complete a questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach. Descriptive statistics (frequency with percent) of questionnaire results and the presence of procedural errors while taking pictures were calculated. Correlations between different questionnaire answers were analyzed with the Chi-Square test. Variables with p < 0:05 were declared as significant. Results: The majority of patients considered that this approach was positive and they did not feel abandoned. Difficulties emerged from a technical point of view, that is, in terms of photoshoot, and part of the patients expressed perplexity regarding the fact that telemonitoring can replace completely an outpatient visit. Conclusion: The use of telemonitoring managed to recreate a relationship with the orthodontist, especially in emergency periods.